Agency Transportation Department

Contractor WSB LLC

SWIFT Contract Number 208426

Project Name Project Supervisor - CPM Schedule Review

Project Number (if applicable) 1049377

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: This was 2-year project with multiple intermediate completion dates that required an accurate and complex CPM schedule and review to meet these project deadlines. Change Orders were going to be complex and thus we want to ensure the department was adequately represented in these additional costs

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 03/08/2022 - 00:00

Original end date Sat, 06/15/2024 - 00:00

Actual end date Sat, 06/15/2024 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $91991.43

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $91991.43

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? {Empty}

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) bond funds

Evaluator Name Klasen,Michael P

Evaluator Email Address Michael.Klasen@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness CPM reviews were performed in a timely manner and written contract changes were typically returned on the same day.

Evaluate the contractor's quality CPM reviews always came back with very accurate analysis and the contractor always followed up with a phone call to explain his review reports so I could understand what he was seeing and what his comments meant. This enabled me to realize deadlines. A good example of this was a surcharge that was put in place, he was able to identify additional time built into the schedule to allow further consolidation that I and the contractor did not anticipate. Resulting in better long-term performance of this particular area of the roadway

Evaluate the contractor's cost It seems the efficiency and accuracy at how the CPM reviews and contract changes were written and turned around quickly resulted in a good cost/value benefit to the department

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance good

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied