Agency Revenue Dept

Contractor Rozin Security Consulting

SWIFT Contract Number 253682

Project Name Safety/Security Assessment

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of the contract was twofold: 1) Conduct an assessment to review physical location and possible alternative locations of cashiering function within the Stassen facilities to include an assessment of physical, technological, and operational security measures. 2) Provide a Security Risk Assessment and provide recommendations for security improvements of the Stassen facility.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 08/01/2024 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 06/30/2025 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 06/30/2025 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $74700

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $74700

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State/1000

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Dale Dorschner

Evaluator Email Address dale.dorschner@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor was not timely with issuing their security assessment reports.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of the draft and final report was not satisfactory.

Evaluate the contractor's cost We are not sure how best to compare cost as we used the contractor through the equity select process because they had been our security consultant in the past, and it was determined that they would have the best knowledge of our facility.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Poor

Would you engage the contractor's services again? No

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): Contractor was delayed in issuing their security assessment reports and were not well prepared when presenting final report with findings and recommendations to senior leadership.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 1 - very dissatisfied