Agency Agriculture Dept

Contractor Terracon Consultants

SWIFT Contract Number 256862

Project Name 256862 Terracon Phase 20 GWSWMW Sampling

Project Number (if applicable) RWA253112

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of this contract was to monitor and repair wells at creosote-impacted soil and debris sites
from the former Kettle River Company Creosote Plant Site in Sandstone, MN. The work was necessary
to remove and dispose of creosote-contaminated materials that posed a threat to human health and
the environment.

Project Duration

Start Date Sun, 09/01/2024 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 06/30/2025 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 06/30/2025 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $97914.46

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $97914.46

Did project finish within budget? {Empty}

What was the funding source? MERLA FY25

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Eric Clanton

Evaluator Email Address eric.clanton@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor completed the tasks of the project in the time/schedule that was set by the MDA. The
Contractor did a great job providing daily communications to the MDA, recommendations, and
feedback regarding the progress of the work.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of the Contractor's services and deliverables was good. The Contractor provided
appropriate communications to MDA staff and the MDA's consultant providing oversight on the project.
The Contractor performed the services safely and respectfully

Evaluate the contractor's cost The Contractor's costs and unit prices were fair and reasonable. The Contractor was diligent in
providing daily reports and costs to the MDA, allowing the MDA to update the project's budget and to
prepare appropriate Work Change Directives to the contract.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Contractor's performance on the project was great. On-site management and personnel
communicated well with the MDA and the MDA's consultant on a daily basis. Staff responded
professionally, appropriately, and with flexibility to requests and direction by the MDA in response to
unanticipated challenges encountered during the site work. The Contractor appropriately and
professionally managed and directed their subcontractors to provide adequate services.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied