Submission Number: 12775
Submission ID: 63239
Submission UUID: 9a0744a7-61a8-474d-bcc8-82fe83998dee

Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10
Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10
Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:49

Remote IP address: (unknown)
Submitted by: admin
Language: English

Is draft: No
Current page: webform_submission_import

Locked: Yes
Corrections Dept
Angstrom Analytical, Inc.
33648
Convert Rms to Seg LU - Industrial Hygiene Monitor
78917SHX
Construction project required air monitoring during abatement of asbestos containing floor tile adhesive that needed removal to accommodate new work.
Project Duration
Thu, 10/11/2012 - 00:00
Wed, 10/12/2011 - 00:00
Wed, 10/12/2011 - 00:00
Yes
{Empty}
Contract Amounts
$1600.00
$-100.00
$1500.00
Yes
FY 1 Agency Funds
Yes
State regulates companies to choose from based on county, and within limits.
Glen Heino
glen.heino@state.mn.us
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project. Final cost was actually $100.00 less than estimate.
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.
Yes
n/a
5 - very satisfied