Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor CH2M Hill

SWIFT Contract Number B54606

Project Name Best Practices and Policy Guidance - Cty RoadwaY

Project Number (if applicable) 98468

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The best practices guidance will identify what has worked to improve safety, how were crashes effected, under what kind of circumstances and with what features. Following the documentation of the best practices, Contractor will develop a sample policy statement for each of the strategies that with only minor modifications could be customized by individual counties and incorporated into their transportation/safety plans.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 03/30/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 09/30/2011 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 09/30/2011 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) 393.9

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $74700.30

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $61271.67

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Mark Vizecky

Evaluator Email Address Mark.vizecky@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness All deliverables that were a part of this project were completed in a timely manner and the final product was delivered by September 30th, 2011 deadline. The timeline for the project was very tight from the beginning and it was made even tighter with the State Shutdown but the contractor still was able to complete all the tasks that were asked of them on time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor has delivered a product that exceeds standards. Other than the feedback and comments that the contractor has received from the TAP for the handbook that was put together, there was no other direction that was needed for them to deliver a high quality product

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor delivered all products and tasks that were asked of them within budget.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor performed exceptionally well given the very tight schedule that they were given to complete the project. They needed very little direction in order to complete the tasks that were outlined for them. They worked very well with all members of the TAP. They did a great job with documenting all comments and feedback received from the TAP members for the draft copies of the handbook and also communicating the resolution/action for each comment. Overall, they were very easy to work with and their expertise in the area of traffic safety and project management was a much appreciated advantage for the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): There were no negative actions taken during the contract.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied