Agency Public Safety Dept

Contractor Modis

SWIFT Contract Number B52274/27018

Project Name Java Prog Sr for NCHIP NFF project

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: This contract was to perform software development on the BCA's NFF project. The NFF project contract work was funded by a federal NCHIP grant to bring the State into compliance with the FBI's National Fingerprint File (NFF) processing rules for criminal arrest fingerprints and fingerprint based background checks.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 01/10/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 08/02/2011 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 10/31/2011 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) 1204

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $95192.00

Amendments $18250.00

Contract total $113442.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Federal NCHIP Grant

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name margarita Rock

Evaluator Email Address margarita.r.rock@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor's timliness was good.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of work was inconsistent. Much of the software developed worked according to the requirement, however some had to be re-written.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Cost was within the project's budget and complied with the contract.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor was enthusiastic and eager to complete tasks.
I think the work required on this project turned out to be above her skill level.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? No

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): The person supplied under this contract was terminated shortly before the end of the contract when it was deemed that recently developed code would need to be re-written.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 3 - neutral