Submission information
Submission Number: 12884
Submission ID: 63348
Submission UUID: c26c4528-302b-4dd3-bf38-6f8bc527c533
Submission URI: /form/vendor-performance-evaluation
Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10
Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10
Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:49
Remote IP address: (unknown)
Submitted by: admin
Language: English
Is draft: No
Current page: webform_submission_import
Webform: Vendor Performance Evaluation
Locked: Yes
• This ensured overall comparability of analysis to previous years (including consistency of
weighting factors as they were applied to each of the 7 counties, statewide analysis and the
7 county study area. The survey design allowed for studying five distinct but overlapping
populations
• Weighting was critical to ensuring findings reflected were representative.
• Statistical significance testing for each finding .
• Consistency in reporting from previous year (final reporting varies widely across firms, and some do not include key findings analysis or even question-by-question analysis).
• Integration of data from the field into the analysis software reduced the time and inefficiencies up-front.
• There is a running knowledge and understanding of opinions on these traffic safety issues in
MN over time.
• The OTS can easily identify the key findings in the reports
• The capacity internally to complete all work in a short timeframe which is critical.
• This is the final statewide telephone survey in its current format and final year of the seven countysurveys, so the OTS wants to reduce the potential of introducing inaccurate results due to the weighting process and lack of familiarity of the data.
recommended by the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). They were very responsive to suggestions made by the OTS.
excellent and very open to recommendations for reporting the results.
a 2%increase. Originally the time allotted for the work was 8 weeks, but the time to complete the
work was actually 6 weeks. Extra effort by the contractor especially over the holiday season was a good esample of the contractor understanding and embracing the service and goals of the project.
The costs were properly allocated based on this evaluator's experience.