Agency Public Safety Dept

Contractor Knowledge IT, a Cooperative

SWIFT Contract Number B49398

Project Name MNLARS User Acceptance Testing MCSIA

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The State is in need of professional technical services to analyze current DVS system software, MCSIA requirements, and identify gaps in functionality. Contractors will assist in the design of new features and make changes to current functionality required to close those gaps. Contractors will develop software according to DVS design requirements. Contractors will conduct unit tests, coordinate with DVS business analysts who will condust User Acceptance Testing to approve new functionality, and deploy changes into production. Contractors will assist in routine operational tasks and driver's license analysis and programming, as needed.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 10/01/2010 - 00:00

Original end date Sat, 03/31/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 01/31/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $573049.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $573049.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? MCSIA Grant

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Contractor's staff possesses in-depth knowledge of the existing business processes, data, and technology which perform the functions specified. Contractor's staff has developed specialized expertise inthe application of necessary abilities and functions required by federal and state laws. Contractor staff understands the current technical challenges associated with the current systems. Contractor staff understands the fragility of the existing system.

Evaluator Name Matthew Marrin

Evaluator Email Address matthew.marrin@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness We experienced no issues with this Vendor as it relates to the timeliness of the agreed upon deliverables, and its rejoinder to concerns or problems associated to the Vendors deliverables.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of the Vendors deliverables were commenable and our business partners judged this as outstanding work as our objectives were fulfilled.

Evaluate the contractor's cost In terms of the Vendors costs; the value and the correctness of the Vendors delverables were in alignment with our expectations and the Vendors costs were reasonable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Vendors overall performance was above expectation; the Vendor did exceed our expectations and timeliness, and deliverables from the Vendor were completed successfully.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None, no issues.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied