Agency Faribault Academies

Contractor Environmental Management Associates, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 24906 (441623 MAPS)

Project Name Design of Asbestos Abatement Water Line Insulation

Project Number (if applicable) 44DA0010

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Design for abatement of asbestos-containing insulation on water pipe needing replacement at Mott Hall on the MSAD campus

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 10/20/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 03/18/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 03/18/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $400.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $400.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? '08 AP

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) From master contract list of preferred vendors assigned to this project site

Evaluator Name Glen Heino

Evaluator Email Address glen.heino@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's quality
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's cost
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance
Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): n/a

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied