Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor URS Corporation

SWIFT Contract Number B41738

Project Name Phase II Environmental Site Assessment

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: MnDOT was evaluating alternatives for the reconstruction of a portion of TH 52 between 327th Street and TH 19 in Cannon Falls, MN. The preferred alternative entails: replacement of signalized intersections at TH 52/North CSAH 24 and TH 52/South CSAH 24 with a new TH 52 mainline overpass and a diamond interchange, respectively; termination of street level TH 52 access at various points along the Project Corridor; and construction of east and west frontage roads north and south of the TH 52/South CSAH 24 diamond interchange. The preferred alternative includes acquisition of new right-of-way. The intent of this contract was to identify to the extent possible any sources of contamination that could impact the project corridor, and to complete a drilling investigation of any suspect areas to identify the presence, magnitude and extent of contaminated soil and/or groundwater in the project corridor. The information obtained by this drilling investigation will be used by MnDOT to assess the feasibility of the preferred alternative and develop final project design plans and specifications.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 04/15/2010 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 01/31/2011 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 01/31/2011 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $66282.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $66282.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name David Liverseed

Evaluator Email Address david.liverseed@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness above average

Evaluate the contractor's quality above average

Evaluate the contractor's cost reasonable

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance above average

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied