Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Collaborative Design Group, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number B38596; 26510

Project Name Cascade River Restoration - Stimulus 2

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The Cascade River Wayside is located on TH 61at milepost 100. It includes stone overlook walls, Bridge 5162 and other site elements. This site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. To assess the current condition of this historic site, State contracted for an updated Treatment Report that was completed in early 2010. By reference this above noted Treatment Report is a part of the background data for this Contract. This Treatment Report is the basis for the scope of work listed in this Contract. The purpose of this project is to provide the following services:
• Contractor will prepare a set of construction contract documents – Plans, Specifications and Cost Opinion – suitable for competitive construction bidding.
• Contractor will provide support to State’s staff during the Construction Contract bidding phase, including a mandatory pre-bid meeting at Cascade River Wayside.
• Contractor will prepare a comprehensive 15 year site management plan for State’s maintenance staff to implement to protect the site and minimize the deterioration of this historic site.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 02/04/2010 - 00:00

Original end date Sat, 07/31/2010 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 09/30/2011 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) 679.5

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $77050.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $77050.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Stimulus 2

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Kathryn McFadden

Evaluator Email Address kathryn.mcfadden@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness below average

Evaluate the contractor's quality average

Evaluate the contractor's cost average

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance insufficient quality control written into the plans and specifications to bring up to Secretary of Interior's Standards

Would you engage the contractor's services again? No

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 2 - dissatisfied