Agency Public Safety Dept

Contractor North Highland

SWIFT Contract Number 40912

Project Name MNLARS Risk Assessment

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: MNLARS is an initiative of the Department of Public Safety Driver and Vehicle Services (DVS) division to replace its aging information system with an integrated motor vehicle and driver’s license solution and related implementation, support and maintenance services.

To help ensure the success of these efforts, DVS is committed to the ongoing process of Risk Management. Toward that end, DVS is seeking a contract with a qualified vendor to carry out the risk assessment process and to develop a responsive risk mitigation plan.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 02/01/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Sat, 06/30/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 04/10/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $49200.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $49200.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? MNLARS

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Semyon Axelrod

Evaluator Email Address semyon.axelrod@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness We experienced no issues with this Vendor as it related to the timeliness of the agreed upon
deliverables.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of the contractor's deliverables was very good and the presentations were also very good.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor's costs were very reasonable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor's overall performance met expectations; the Vendor did exceed our expectations in flexibility and timelines. However, some sensitive material in the final risk report could have been handled more carefully. Finally, the analysis of risks that the vendor provided was not robust enough to uncover the actual and not obvious reasons that were driving some of the perceived risks.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None. No issues.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied