Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Landmark Environmental, LLC

SWIFT Contract Number B48839

Project Name Contaminated Property Investigation for Twin Citie

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: State is in need of a Contaminated Property investigation – Level 1 – on approximately 40 acres of land associated with TH 10 and Interstate Highway 35W that is currently part of the Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant (TCAAP) located in Arden Hills, Minnesota. TCAAP is a federal and state Superfund site that State plans to acquire. To understand and minimize long and short-term environmental liability related to the acquisition, ownership, and ongoing maintenance requirements, State must complete environmental due diligence prior to acquisition in order to receive written liability assurances and regulatory approvals from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As part of the environmental due diligence, this scope of work provides specific expertise related to the proposed property transaction involving federal and state Superfund liability, and regulatory negotiation support to obtain assurances, as needed.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 09/10/2010 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 01/31/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 01/31/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $28090.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $28090.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name David Liverseed

Evaluator Email Address david.liverseed@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness acceptable

Evaluate the contractor's quality acceptable

Evaluate the contractor's cost reasonable

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance very good

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied