Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Yaggy Colby Associates

SWIFT Contract Number 3000025155

Project Name Construction Inspection and Contract Administratio

Project Number (if applicable) 98090

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: This contract provided the State with complete construction inspection and contract administration services for the highway improvement project; State Project 8707-51. The construction of the project was funded in part by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and in part by the Upper Sioux Community (tribal government). In partnership with the Upper Sioux Community, the State agreed to provide construction engineering for the work. Due to the unique funding opportunity, the project was largely unexpected, and the State was not able to staff it through normal District resources.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 04/27/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Thu, 12/01/2011 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 04/01/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $186097.77

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $144303.35

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? District 8 Consultant allocation – State Road Cons

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Kelly Brunkhorst

Evaluator Email Address kelly.brunkhorst@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The Contractor completed the work on time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality of the work was satisfactory.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The Contractor’s cost was fair/market value.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Contractor performed the contracted tasks even though there were many nontraditional elements and events associated with this contract. The construction contract was for the Upper Sioux Community and not all of MnDOT’s traditional practices were needed. In addition, tribal allowances posed the need to improvise and document some things differently. The State government shutdown occurred as this contract was about to get underway. This caused some unknowns in the contract administration of this project until the shutdown ended and the construction contractor was able to schedule the work. Yaggy Colby did a good job of adapting to these situations.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied