Agency Administration Dept

Contractor Energy & Building Management

SWIFT Contract Number NA76282MPP

Project Name Energy Investigation (part of larger project)

Project Number (if applicable) 76282MPP

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: This was a pilot project originally intended to be run as part of the Public Buildings Enhanced Energy Efficiency Program (PBEEEP). The study did not follow these guidelines and thus is not rated as a PBEEEP project.

Project Duration

Start Date Sat, 09/19/2009 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 04/30/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Thu, 05/31/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $0

Amendments $39600

Contract total $39600

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Federal Funds

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) It was an amendment to an existing contract for a campus energy project at MVH Minneapolis.

Evaluator Name Christopher Plum

Evaluator Email Address cplum@mncee.org

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The work did not meet the requirements of PBEEEP and thus the final report is not in the standard format for the program. Based on the start date of September 2009 the project should be completed by August 2010; it took nearly 2 years longer to finish.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality was not up to PBEEEP standards. The calculations were fine, but were based on one day’s worth of data when the program requires a minimum of 6 weeks.

Evaluate the contractor's cost This was a bid project and the cost was equal to the amount bid with no changes.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The overall performance identified realistic and achievable energy savings opportunities for MVH Minneapolis, but did not meet the requirements of PBEEEP.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? No

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 3 - neutral