Agency Faribault Academies

Contractor Hammel Green and Abrahamson

SWIFT Contract Number 33601/35909

Project Name PBEEEP Energy Investigation Academy for the Deaf

Project Number (if applicable) 44103FAD

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The contract is for a study in the state of Minnesota’s Public Buildings Enhanced energy Efficiency Program (PBEEEP) which applies a standard analysis and investigation method to determine the technical and economic feasibility of measures that will result in decreased energy use.

The results will be recorded in the State PBEEEP Findings Workbook and in an Investigation Report which will include the measures selected by Minnesota Academy for the Deaf for implementation in the following phase of the project.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 10/26/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 04/30/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Sat, 04/28/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $24990.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $24990.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Federal Funds

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) A different provider started this project and left it incomplete. HGA was hired because they had performed successful projects in the PBEEEP program and had the capacity to do the work in the short time frame available.

Evaluator Name Christopher Plum

Evaluator Email Address cplum@mncee.org

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The work met the requirements of the program. It was done successfully on a short timeline.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The quality met the requirements of the program. There were moderate savings identified for Minnesota Academy for the Deaf.

Evaluate the contractor's cost This was a bid project and the cost was equal to the amount bid with no changes.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The performance met the requirements of the program.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied