Agency Human Services Dept

Contractor Young & Associates Architects LTD

SWIFT Contract Number 45177

Project Name Study Warehouse to Offices-A & E Assess-Amrtc

Project Number (if applicable) 55AK0005

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Provide a study report for assessment and recommendation for the potential renovation of portions of the former dietary services building on the ASMRTC campus to accommodate the central offices of the MSOCS program. The study report to provide general recommendations and project information for development options to assist DHS in determining the suitability of this site for the needs of the MNSOCS facilities.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 05/02/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 10/23/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 05/18/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $8200.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $8200.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Agency

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Young & Assocaites has been doing wortk on the AMRTC campus and was familiar with the campus buildings, DHS's needs, and goals.

Evaluator Name Gary A. Krocak

Evaluator Email Address gary.krocak@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Youngs & Associates started work immediatiely upon receipt of NTP and completed work on schedule.

Evaluate the contractor's quality A quality comprehensive study report that met DHS's needs.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Acceptable and fair as expected.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Overall: Good. Study report was good quality and delivered on schedule.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied