Agency Administration Dept

Contractor Roof Spec, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 444694/Swift 21644

Project Name Replace Roof & Related Repairs Gov Res

Project Number (if applicable) 02727GRX

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Nedd for asset preservation repairs of leaking roof that was causing damage to interiors. Roof Spec Inc. determined types and costs of repairs that needed to be bid out.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 03/18/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Sat, 06/30/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 07/31/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $8000.00

Amendments $2800.00

Contract total $10800.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? FY11 Agency

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Consultant specialist in this work selected from State vendor list with fee well within guidelines.

Evaluator Name Glen Heino

Evaluator Email Address glen.heino@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Excellent – The Consultant performed in a better than average manner that demonstrating a good understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance outweighs any negative performance. The Consultant contributed a great deal to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Excellent – The Consultant performed in a better than average manner that demonstrating a good understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance outweighs any negative performance. The Consultant contributed a great deal to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Excellent – The Consultant performed in a better than average manner that demonstrating a good understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance outweighs any negative performance. The Consultant contributed a great deal to the success of the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): n/a

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied