Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (formerly known a

SWIFT Contract Number 3000019639

Project Name Design of Approaches for Replacing Bridge No. 6773

Project Number (if applicable) 95660

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The State contracted with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. to provide professional, technical assistance to complete preliminary and detail design of approach roadways for the replacement of Bridge No. 6773 on U S Highway 61 over Gilbert Creek in Lake City, Minnesota. This design work was in conjunction with the larger project by the State’s Bridge Office in Oakdale to replace Bridge No. 6773. The Contractor completed, among other deliverables, categorical exclusion document, design memorandum, geometric layout, preliminary and detail design for the approach roadways and traffic control plan. After discussing with section leaders the work to be completed, it was determined that there was no State employee with the required expertise available to complete this work.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 12/18/2009 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 11/01/2011 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 11/01/2011 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $147021.65

Amendments $23287.79

Contract total $170309.44

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway,

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Heather Lukes

Evaluator Email Address Heather.lukes@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Delivered on contract items on time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Plans and documents met MnDOT standards.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Contractor billed for work completed after the Contract had expired.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Contractor’s performance on this project was average.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied