Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Transmart Technologies, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 3000020240

Project Name US 52 Traffic Forecast and Growth Analysis

Project Number (if applicable) 97726

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The State contracted with Transmart Technologies, Inc. to provide professional technical assistance to conduct assistance to conduct a traffic forecast and growth study on US Highway 52 from Interstate 90 (I-90) to Chatfield. The study investigated the existing traffic flow conditions and provided traffic forecasts of the 15 mile corridor. The Contractor completed a final project report containing, but not limited to traffic safety and access management analysis of the existing roadway. The results of this study will be used to determine the appropriate environmental document and aid in development of the environmental document and geometric layout alternatives in development of a future reconstruction porject in the corridor.
After discussing with section leaders the work to be completed, it was determined that there was no State employee with the required expertiose availabe to complete the work.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 05/04/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 05/15/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 01/10/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $99928.53

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $99928.53

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TH

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Anthony Wagner

Evaluator Email Address anthony.wagner@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The Contractor was very timely on all of the project deliverables.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The overall final quality of the Contractor’s deliverables was excellent. My only negative comments is that some of the intermediate deliverables should have received additional QA/QC prior to submittal.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The Contractor managed the cost of the Contract very well and completed the project within budget.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Contractor provided quality deliverables on a timely basis that met the Contract requirements. The Contractor’s project team was very professional and cooperative. We were very satisfied with the Contractor’s work products and would engage the Contractor in future work of this type.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied