Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Hydro-Klean, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 3000067797

Project Name Video Inspection of Large Pipes from Manning Avenu

Project Number (if applicable) 1201

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of this Contract was to provide inspection, location and digital video of storm water system features along I-94 from Manning Avenue (T.H. 95) to the St. Croix River in Washington County.

A contract was necessary because the necessary expertise and specialized equipment were not available within MnDOT

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 07/03/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 10/31/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 10/15/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $99745.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $99745.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Lee Daleiden

Evaluator Email Address lee.daleiden@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Could not have been better. I gave them a time frame for which I needed the project done and they met it without going over. Great job

Evaluate the contractor's quality Hydro Klean put forth a new crew leader. He had to learn MnDOT processes for inspecting storm sewer (HYDINFRA Rating Guide). Some poor video quality was collected by the contractor but they were responsive to the poor quality and re-televised the features in question.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Good. They did not charge MnDOT for re-televising of poor quality videos.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Overall Hydro Klean did a good job. They completed everything within the time frame that I had laid out. Some sloppy errors when creating temporary identification numbers for new feature; the numbering scheme did not match on the maps/videos/WinCan database. Video quality was good. HYDINFRA data was good. The WinCan program for video viewing was simple to use and managed the data well. The field crew was very professional when I met them in the field to go over the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied