Agency Public Safety Dept

Contractor Law Enforcement Technology Group

SWIFT Contract Number 54258

Project Name CIBRS Vendor Upgrade

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of the contract was to increase local law enforcement’s ability to send incident data from their Record Management Systems to the Comprehensive Incident-Based Reporting System. It is necessary to enable greater law enforcement participation in the submission of incident data to the Comprehensive Incident-Based Reporting System in order to facilitate the sharing of information amongst law enforcement statewide.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 10/15/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 11/21/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Wed, 11/21/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $40186.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $40186.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Federal

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Paul Schoen

Evaluator Email Address Paul.Schoen@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor performed the work in a timely and in a expedited manner.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor's quality of work was good and assisted the State in improving our documentation regarding the new process for submissions.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The cost for the deliverables was fixed and reasonable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor’s overall performance was very good. The State was upgrading and changing our method’s of submitting incident data to the BCA. This vendor was one of the first two using the new process and it was necessary for both the vendor and the State to work together to work through issues as they arose. The contractor worked through issues quickly as the timeframe was limited.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied