Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Trissential, LLC

SWIFT Contract Number 3000079803

Project Name TranSWIFT – MAPS Replacement Project

Project Number (if applicable) 96802

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Mn/DOT needed to implement the State’s new Accounting and Procuremnt solution (PeopleSoft). To accompolish this Mn/DOT reengineered many business processes, modified more than 20 business applications, replaced an additional 11 business applications. In addition, we were required to build a new Mn/DOT data Warehouse, crosswalk all historical data with the new chart of accounts information for historical reporting purposes, and modify all financial reporting accross the Agency. This system implementation will require the project to develop and deliver training to all Mn/DOT employees.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 05/13/2010 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 04/20/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 10/05/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) 8809

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $1058715.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $1058715.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) This contract will replaced three existing and separate contracts which expire dprior to the implementation of the State Accounting and Procurement Application, SWIFT, and ensured the expert knowledge remained available to our Implementation and Reengineering teams through the implementation. The three original contracts were established through the Enterprise IT Services Program and in each case the call for resumes procedures were used and resumes reviewed as part of the award process.

Evaluator Name Bill Roen

Evaluator Email Address Bill.Roen@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor met all timelines

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contactor provided skilled and knowledgeable employees within the service categories as requested

Evaluate the contractor's cost The tiered hourly rates per service categories was fair

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The overall performance of this contractor was very good. The resources provided were professional and knowledgeable. The Management team was easy to work with and responsive.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): No negative action was required during the execution of this contract

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied