Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor URS Corporation

SWIFT Contract Number 3000084830, 3000048392

Project Name Site Development Unit Support and Construction Man

Project Number (if applicable) 750

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Contractor will provide support in both the area of program policy development and construction project management/administration. Contractor's work will supplement the work of State's Site Development Unit's staff.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 03/30/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 07/31/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Wed, 11/14/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $95000.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $98129.90

Did project finish within budget? No

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Carol Reamer

Evaluator Email Address carol.reamer@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor’s staff assigned to MnDOT worked quickly and had the ability to shift from project task to task and from project to project within a single day and from week to week without lag time. Kept project information organized and had excellent memory skills to manage several projects at one time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Excellent quality on all product delivered

Evaluate the contractor's cost Productivity and service value compared with cost was excellent

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance I was very pleased with the ability of the lead worker – Steve Wyczawski, LLA – to take an assigned project and related tasks and independently gather information and prepare recommendations for the SDU Project Manager’s (PM) to review and consider. Steve was diligent in being inclusive of all CO and District stakeholders when gathering information and reviewing options with PM. Steve kept each PM he worked with informed of all actions. Steve reviewed all recommendation with PM prior before obtaining stakeholder review of proposals. The communication structure kept the PM in the lead position for all decisions. Coordination with other URS staff for drafting and structural design support was excellent and efficiently managed by Steve making a seamless delivery of services from URS. My entire staff are pleased with the contractors performance of work listed in this contract.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied