Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor URS Corporation

SWIFT Contract Number 3000084953/3000049337

Project Name Phase II Investigations; S.P. 8580-149

Project Number (if applicable) 748

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Summarize the purpose of the Contract, including why it was necessary:
State is in need of Contractor to complete a drilling investigation for the Dresbach Bridge Project. State has been engaged in on-going environmental evaluation of the TH I-90 Dresbach Bridge Project Corridor in advance of reconstruction of Brides 85801 and 85802 over the Mississippi River at the Minnesota/Wisconsin State Line. The preferred alternative includes replacement of the I-90 bridge, reconstruction of the bridge approaches, reconfiguration of the I-90/US 61 interchange and reconfiguration of the riverfront access. The project would replace the existing I-90 bridge over the Mississippi River with two separate bridges; one for eastbound traffic and one for westbound traffic. The intent of this contract is to identify to the extent possible any sources of contamination that could impact the project corridor, and to complete a drilling investigation of any suspect areas to identify the presence, magnitude and extent of contaminated soil and/or groundwater in the project corridor. The information obtained by this drilling investigation will be used by State to complete pre-construction planning for mitigation of contaminated media encountered during construction.

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 03/27/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 09/30/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 11/30/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $56822.38

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $56822.38

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Keri Aufdencamp

Evaluator Email Address keri.aufdencamp@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Good

Evaluate the contractor's quality Good

Evaluate the contractor's cost Acceptable

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The Contractor did a good job on this project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied