Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 3000087417, 3000057578

Project Name Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System Contrac

Project Number (if applicable) 98875W08

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: This Contract developed best value procurement documents for the Statewide Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System (RICWS) project. The best value procurement documents provided for the contract between the State and the eventual Design-Build contractor, the information was made available to proposing teams and evaluation and scoring criteria was used for each phase of the two phase selection process. The RICWS program consists of a design-build team to design and construct as few as 20 to 25 Intersection Conflict Warning systems to as many as 100 Intersection Conflict Warning systems at intersections throughout the state.

The result of this Conytact was best value procurement documents including Request for Qualification, Design Build documents (review of Book 1, development of Book 2 and 3), Instructions to Proposers for solicitation and Reference Information Documents for the Request for Proposal process.

This Contract was reasonable in order to use the expertise and skill sets of the Alterative Contracting GEC to advance
The RICWS program. MnDOT did not have the resources or technical skills to successfully develop and implement
This type of Alternative Contracting initiative.

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 05/08/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Thu, 02/28/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Thu, 02/28/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $207373.78

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $207373.78

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State Funds

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Ken Hansen

Evaluator Email Address Kenneth.hansen@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Above Average

Evaluate the contractor's quality Above Average

Evaluate the contractor's cost Average

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Above Average

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied