Agency Public Safety Dept

Contractor SDK Software Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number B54615/14737

Project Name Staff Augmentation Patel/Truong

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Duties the Contractor’s technical analyst may perform include but are not limited to the following:

o Migrate projects from Subversion, TFS, VSS and BugZilla to Rational Team Concert (RTC);
o Setup project builds and automated deployments, and implement Change Management process integration in Anthill Pro;
o Migrate WebLogic and Oracle Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) projects to RTC and Anthill Pro;
o Perform technical work in the rollout of Rational Requirements Composer, Rational Quality Manager, and Fortify 360;
o Assist BCA personnel as needed with technical expertise. Provide tool demos and answer questions on an ongoing basis. Promote tool and process use among BCA development and operations teams.
o Provide thorough and complete documentation to assist the BCA in its transition to the new tools, including but not limited to, user manuals and system administration notes;
o Work with the BCA management team to provide estimates and status updates; and
o Work with 3rd party vendors for product support needs;

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 04/04/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 03/30/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 03/31/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) 3576

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $156040.00

Amendments $183754.00

Contract total $339794.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Kurt Augustin

Evaluator Email Address kurt.augustin@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor's timeliness was acceptable. All tasks and project deliverables were completed on time.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Contractor's quality was outstanding. The project goals were very agressive and the tools to be implemented very complex and leading edge.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Contractor's cost was inline with other consulting contracts of this size and complexity.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Contractor's overall performace was excellent.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied