Submission Number: 14000
Submission ID: 64464
Submission UUID: a3418088-aa51-4387-8709-b999e7cdeb31

Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10
Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10
Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:50

Remote IP address: (unknown)
Submitted by: admin
Language: English

Is draft: No
Current page: webform_submission_import

Locked: Yes
TRANSPORTATION DEPT
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
3000076541
Pre and Final Design for Cayuga & Maryland bridge
97139
This Contract was foe project development of the Cayuga and Maryland Avenue bridge projects through final design and concept development of traffic alternative along the I-35E corridor from downtown St. Paul to the northern suburbs.

The Cayuga bridge is on the Chapter 152 list of bridge considered to be fracture critical and needs to be replaced. The legislature approved funidng to advance the project sooner than anticipated.
Project Duration
Wed, 12/01/2010 - 00:00
Sat, 06/30/2012 - 00:00
Tue, 04/30/2013 - 00:00
Yes
67536
Contract Amounts
$6057271.26
$2335426.39
$8392697.65
Yes
State Bond Funds
No
{Empty}
Josephine Lundquist
Joey.Lundsuist@state.mn.us
The consultnat accomplished the tasks assigned in the timeframe we asked for. The project was delivered on time.
Dan Dorgan and Steve Jensen were excellent project managers for the project and produced an excellent product.
The cost was what was to be expected from a consultant.
Overall, I was happy working with HDR and the sub-consultants. They accomplished the tasks assigned and got us the answers and construction plans with so many subcontractors:
The plans are split into many pieces and required more sheets than if one consultant had done it.
The cross sections in the plans were more complicated due to how the project was split between the sub-consultants.
There was much more coordination than if we were working with one company (they each had to be consistent with each other and have coordination meetings with the sub-consultants.
It was more expensive due to the extra coordinatin witht he sub-contractors (would have been much cheaper and more efficient with one consultant doing the design.
I would not recommend having so many sub-consultants on a project in the future.
Yes
{Empty}
5 - very satisfied