Agency Agriculture Dept

Contractor Terracon

SWIFT Contract Number 58262

Project Name Kettle River Company - Creosote Plant Site

Project Number (if applicable) RWA253112

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: This contract with Terracon was for the purpose of Terracon providing project oversight of the Phase IX soil remediation project at the Sandstone site. Project oversight responsibilities included being on site during all site activities being conducted by a separate MMD Construction Contractor (Clean Harbors). Site activities included soil sample collection, analysis, reporting; and guidance for excavation, loading, hauling, soil disposal, backfilling and site restoration.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 03/01/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 06/30/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 06/30/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $41484.65

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $41484.65

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? 13 – 2801 – B04311R7 – B41E02 - 411310

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Robert Anderson

Evaluator Email Address robert.anderson@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor not only ensured that project schedule was followed, but also ensured that the prime construction contractor schedule was being met.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Terracon continues to provide a high degree of professionalism to each phase of this project, office and field staff performs well and provide professionalism on site and in the public eye.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Terracon has been involved in prior phases of the project over the years and is able to reduce project costs by being aware of what actions and responses will be necessary based on prior experience. This has resulted in subsequent project estimates continually being reduced.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Terracon’s performance continues to be of a high caliber, always ensuring the project is completed correctly and on time, but also ensuring that all State concerns and needs are being met. Knowing Terracon is on the project enables State project management to feel comfortable that the project will progress well.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): No negative actions.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied