Agency Agriculture Dept

Contractor Terracon

SWIFT Contract Number 58861

Project Name Mallard Ridge Pentachlorophenol Site -- Zimmerman

Project Number (if applicable) PVM257092

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The environmental contractor (Terracon) was tasked for the oversight of the excavation, loading and disposal of stockpiled pentachlorophenol contaminated soil, installation of monitoring wells, sampling of soil and groundwater and report preparation. The Site is a former wood treating facility in Zimmerman and soil and groundwater was impacted by former operations at the Site. The Site was operated in the 1970's and there was no responsible party available, therefore funds from the ACRRA Account were used.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 03/06/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 06/30/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 06/30/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $34544.36

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $13307.79

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? FY13 2018 BO4311R9 BO41A15 411310

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Jeff Paddock

Evaluator Email Address jeff.paddock@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor not only ensured that project schedule was followed, but also ensured that the prime construction contractor schedule was being met.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Terracon continues to provide a high degree of professionalism to each phase of this project, office and field staff performs well and provide professionalism on site and in the public eye.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Terracon is very experienced and competent with environmental remediation. This makes them very efficient in their role as an environmental consultant. They spent less time during the remediation tna anticipated and were therefore below budget.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Terracon’s performance continues to be of a high caliber, always ensuring the project is completed correctly and on time, but also ensuring that all State concerns and needs are being met. Knowing Terracon is on the project enables State project management to feel comfortable that the project will progress well.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): There were no negative actions.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied