Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Bentley Systems Incorporated

SWIFT Contract Number 3000089027 3000047680

Project Name SuperLoad

Project Number (if applicable) 425

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: This contract is to analyze, install software, configure software, knowledge transfer, and training of MnDOT system support staff for the Bentley SuperLoad Bridge software. This will also include modification of the Bentley ARPS/RBNT (RouteBuilder) application that is in use at MnDOT so that it is integrated with the Bentley SuperLoad Bridge software.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 05/10/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 12/31/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 06/30/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $191500.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $191500.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Trunk Highway

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) • SuperLoad Bridge and ARPS/RBNT (RouteBuilder) are vendor owned, proprietary software systems
• Bentley Inc. is the only vendor who has the source code and the rights to modify these systems
• Bentley, Inc. staff have knowledge of these systems and have experience in modifying them
• The software warranty is voided if the software is modified by anyone other than the vendor
• RouteBuilder is being used for managing all routing and permitting of overweight over dimension loads

Evaluator Name Jackie Weldon

Evaluator Email Address Jackie.Weldon@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Average

Evaluate the contractor's quality Average

Evaluate the contractor's cost Average

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Bentley has a clear understanding of the software and the needed enhancements/requirements. Their project manager and staff were easy to work with and provided consistent communication on the status of the project deliverables. The overage on the project end date was due to the decision to integrate the SuperLoad final deliverables with the RouteBuilder Enhancement project deliverables (see summary of project contract information above).

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied