Vendor Performance Evaluation: Submission #14539

Submission information

Submission Number: 14539

Submission ID: 65003

Submission UUID: 00a10f14-f588-4910-a554-4aaa2abd5083

Submission URI: /form/vendor-performance-evaluation

Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:52

Remote IP address: (unknown)

Submitted by: admin

Language: English

Is draft: No

Current page: webform_submission_import

Webform: Vendor Performance Evaluation

Locked: Yes

Agency Corrections Dept

Contractor BWBR Architects

SWIFT Contract Number 63081

Project Name MCF - RC Study Master Control

Project Number (if applicable) 78RC0010

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Pre design services for the renovation of the Master Control area at MCF-Rush City. This area is not operating as efficiently nor effectively as desired with the current layout. Pre-design to examine all operations of the area including traffic flow and staff equipment storage space, while keeping facility entry point security in mind. Would like at least three possible options along with budgetary numbers for each option.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 06/06/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 08/30/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 12/31/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $22500

Amendments $0

Contract total $22500

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? DOC

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) N/A

Evaluator Name Paul Gannon

Evaluator Email Address paul.gannon@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness very poor bordering on negligence.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Result is somewhat implementable - problem will need redesign if moving forward.

Evaluate the contractor's cost fine

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance This was Mark Ludgatis with BWBR. He would not respond to requests for status, dates, emails etc. without exhaustive prodding. I had to go to his superior to get project finished.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? No

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): I had to go to Mark Ludgatis's superior to get project finished.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 1 - very dissatisfied