Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Summit Envirosolutions

SWIFT Contract Number 3000118071, 3000141028

Project Name I-35E Cayuga Interchange-Historical mitigation doc

Project Number (if applicable) 3494

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of this contract was to prepare mitigation documentation of Bridge No. 92297 as stipulated in a Memorandum of Agreement among the Federal Highway Administration, the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), and State. Bridge No. 92297 has been found to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places as an early example of a reinforced-concrete flat-slab bridge designed during 1908-1912 by CAP Turner, who patented the new design around the same time. Because State is planning to demolish the bridge, Contractor will prepare archival documentation as mitigation for the adverse effect. Contractor will compile Minnesota Historic Properties Record (MHPR) Level I documentation for Bridge No. 92297 according to the guidelines developed by the Minnesota SHPO. The MHPR documentation will consist of photographic recordation and written narrative history. In addition, Contractor will record the bridge during deconstruction, including measured drawings and photographs, in order to document whether or not the bridge was built as planned.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 04/11/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 01/31/2014 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 01/31/2014 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $28605.37

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $28605.37

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State Funds

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Renee Hutter Barnes

Evaluator Email Address renee.barnes@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Average

Evaluate the contractor's quality Average

Evaluate the contractor's cost Average

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Average

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied