Agency Pollution Control Agency

Contractor Regents of the University of Minnesota (MnTAP)

SWIFT Contract Number 35699

Project Name TA to the fiber reinforced plastics mfg sector

Project Number (if applicable) CR5233

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Activities on this project will consist of outreach, development and delivery of educational materials,
demonstration and pilot events, direct technical assistance, and performance validation.
Task 1. Conduct outreach to industry partners, including trade and professional associations, and suppliers.
Task 2. Develop and conduct product demonstrations and plan piloting of the technology.
Task 3. Provide technical assistance and report test and manufacturing trials at participating firms.
Task 4. Develop and conduct two training workshops on alternative resins and metering equipment in central Minnesota to deliver information on the technology, how to implement, and projected savings from reduced air emissions and resin consumption.
Task 5. Assess the performance of implementation and report.

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 10/25/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 09/30/2012 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 09/30/2012 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $35780.00

Amendments $0

Contract total $35780.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? R32D2P2002 and R32D2P2001

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Phyllis Strong

Evaluator Email Address phyllis.strong@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Satisfactory

Evaluate the contractor's quality Satisfactory

Evaluate the contractor's cost Satisfactory

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Satisfactory

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): Reporting was slow.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied