Agency Administration Dept

Contractor Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd.

SWIFT Contract Number 60904

Project Name Design to relocate Capitol Security to Admin Bldg

Project Number (if applicable) 02AD0004

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Design services required for bidding remodeling existing Admin space for the moving of Capitol Security out of the Capitol while renovations are going on there.

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 04/23/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Thu, 10/31/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Thu, 10/31/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $45168.00

Amendments $98879.00

Contract total $144047.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? 2013 Agency

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Selected through SDSB process

Evaluator Name Glen Heino

Evaluator Email Address glen.heino@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): n/a

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied