Vendor Performance Evaluation: Submission #14935

Submission information

Submission Number: 14935

Submission ID: 65399

Submission UUID: e109d48d-3c98-4bb0-a300-3b61330e4fd3

Submission URI: /form/vendor-performance-evaluation

Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:52

Remote IP address: (unknown)

Submitted by: admin

Language: English

Is draft: No

Current page: webform_submission_import

Webform: Vendor Performance Evaluation

Locked: Yes

Agency Administration Dept

Contractor Michaud Cooley Erickson

SWIFT Contract Number 71879

Project Name Design for Remodel Lab L204

Project Number (if applicable) 02LB0009

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Design for Remodel Lab L204 for Ag/Lab Bldg.

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 12/10/2013 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 11/26/2014 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 05/23/2014 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $13800

Amendments $13500

Contract total $27300

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? H1201, 2001, H1234100, H12212S

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Originally under the $25,000 threshold and then added scope to deal with repair of freezing mechanical system in winter.

Evaluator Name Ryan Allen

Evaluator Email Address ryan.allen@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness This project was managed by Peter Hargreaves that left the State. Ryan Allen was assigned to close out the project. It is Ryan's understanding the consultant completed this item satisfactory.

Evaluate the contractor's quality This project was managed by Peter Hargreaves that left the State. Ryan Allen was assigned to close out the project. It is Ryan's understanding the consultant completed this item satisfactory.

Evaluate the contractor's cost This project was managed by Peter Hargreaves that left the State. Ryan Allen was assigned to close out the project. It is Ryan's understanding the consultant completed this item satisfactory.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance This project was managed by Peter Hargreaves that left the State. Ryan Allen was assigned to close out the project. It is Ryan's understanding the consultant completed this item satisfactory.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 3 - neutral