Agency Public Safety Dept

Contractor City of St. Paul, Police Department

SWIFT Contract Number 53763

Project Name Real Time Office Reporting

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The City of St. Paul assisted in the development of the Real-Time Officer Activity Reporting (ROAR) system. This included designing new features, making changes to existing features, and testing to ensure the system was compatible with the Department of Public Safety's processes, security standards, and can be successfully integrated with tools used by the Office of Traffic Safety and its business partners.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 10/01/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Mon, 09/30/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 09/30/2014 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $75000.00

Amendments $25000.00

Contract total $100000.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Federal 402 Funding

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) The City of St. Paul created the Real-Time Officer Activity Reporting system. Their existing knowledge of the system, its history, established contacts with user groups, and their extensive testing of the system made them the only source that could make the requested changes within the timeline provided.

Evaluator Name Lori Bounds

Evaluator Email Address loretta.bounds@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor's timeliness exceeded expectations.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor's quality of work exceeded expectations.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor was paid an overtime rate for overtime hours.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor's contribution to the project was invaluable. The working knowledge of the processes and the design ideas and testing feedback given were exactly why their involvement in the project was crucial.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied