Agency TRANSPORTATION DEPT

Contractor Olmsted County (Governmental Unit)

SWIFT Contract Number 17372

Project Name US 63 Corridor Preservation study and Rochester In

Project Number (if applicable) 93385

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The contracted with Olmsted County (Governmental Unit) to address the need for planning, preliminary design and environmental assessment services for the purpose of identifying transportation improvements needed to preserve the capacity and safety of the US 63 and Interstate 90 corridors in the Willow Creek area of Rochester and the north area of Stewartville, and to support the long term economic development goals of the community related to the Rochester International Airport and surrounding area including a potential interregional rail service terminal co-located with the airport.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 12/24/2008 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 12/10/2010 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 12/24/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $906327.72

Amendments $0

Contract total $906327.72

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? TH

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Olmsted County is more familiar with the problems and issues in this US 63 corridor than the State. Consequently, it was determined that it will save time and cost for the County to perform the study on behalf of the State.

Evaluator Name Mark Schoenfelder

Evaluator Email Address mark.schoenfelder@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor was timely in the development of the deliverables

Evaluate the contractor's quality Quality of the Contractor’s work was above average for the work tasks and deliverables

Evaluate the contractor's cost Cost for services were typical based on the work tasks involved.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Very good and performed above average

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): NONE

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied