Agency Pollution Control Agency

Contractor Terracon

SWIFT Contract Number 21280

Project Name Esko Groundwater Contamination Site

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The MPCA and the MDA are authorized to respond to releases of petroleum, hazardous substances, and pollutants or contaminants, which have been reported to the State or in which the State suspects there has been a release. At some of these release sites "responsible persons" have not been identified, or are unwilling or unable to proceed with a required site investigation and/or corrective action. Contractors have been sought to conduct tasks related to Risk Assessment, Remedial Investigations, Feasibility Studies, Removal and Response Action, Remedial Design, Reponse Action Oversight, and Long-Term Response Action/Operation, and Maintenance Acticities at MPCA Superfund, Petroleum and MDA Remediation Program Sites.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 09/03/2012 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 06/30/2010 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 06/30/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $62000

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $62000

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Superfund

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Chris McLain

Evaluator Email Address chris.mclain@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor competed the project within the original schedule.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor provided reports and data of excellent quality. The contractor completed all the work plan objectives.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor had excellent budget management, and did not submit any incorrect invoices. One change order was created to move unused funds from one task to another, in order to do additional sampling of potable wells.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor's peformance was excellent.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied