Agency Pollution Control Agency

Contractor Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission

SWIFT Contract Number B37348/ 16705

Project Name Shingle Creek Porous Paired Intersection Study

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of the contract was for the Shingle Creek Porous Pavement Paired Intersection Study to estimate the effectiveness of porous asphalt in reducing road salt use for ice control and to estimate effectiveness in reducing runoff volume and salt and nutrient loading to downstream water resources. The secondary research questions are to better understand porous pavement performance on a cold-climate city street and short and long-term maintenance requirements. The project was funded with Clean Water Act Section 319 grant funds which are used for projects to reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution in Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, and streams.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 07/01/2009 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 08/30/2013 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 08/30/2013 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $281992.00

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $248308.40

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? 319

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Celine Lyman

Evaluator Email Address celine.lyman@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor completed the project within the original schedule.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor provided good quality data and other deliverables.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor had satisfactory budget management. One invoice was submitted incorrectly due to one unreconciled payment. Corrections were made and the revised invoice was submitted correctly.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Overall the contractr's performance was satisfactory.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied