Vendor Performance Evaluation: Submission #24810

Submission information

Submission Number: 24810

Submission ID: 75274

Submission UUID: 9109b11e-e768-4b42-a6c1-b4b92203a274

Submission URI: /form/vendor-performance-evaluation

Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:49

Remote IP address: (unknown)

Submitted by: admin

Language: English

Is draft: No

Current page: webform_submission_import

Webform: Vendor Performance Evaluation

Locked: Yes

Agency Human Services Dept

Contractor CHW Solutions LLC

SWIFT Contract Number 180263

Project Name CHW Model Development

Project Number (if applicable) N/A

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The Minnesota Department of Human Services, Resettlement Programs Office (DHS-RPO) initiated a contract to conduct strategic planning and Community Health Worker model development that could be piloted statewide on various health topics and provide technical assistance to implementing partners.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 07/15/2020 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 12/30/2022 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 12/30/2022 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $24750

Amendments $204000

Contract total $228750

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? ORR and COVID relief (Via MDH)

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) This agency was the only organization that provided holistic TA contracts for the assessment, development and implementation of community health worker infrastructure in MN. Other agencies could provide CHW services, but not TA or strategic planning to an external organization.

Evaluator Name Rachele King

Evaluator Email Address rachele.king@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor met timelines set and was flexible to adapt as needs evolved.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Contractor provided high quality services, supports, and engagement.

Evaluate the contractor's cost No comment.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Contractor performed at high level.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied