Vendor Performance Evaluation: Submission #24828

Submission information

Submission Number: 24828

Submission ID: 75292

Submission UUID: 0dc868d9-fa07-4436-8ada-e0bc5f074183

Submission URI: /form/vendor-performance-evaluation

Created: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Completed: Thu, 01/19/2023 - 18:10

Changed: Thu, 02/09/2023 - 14:49

Remote IP address: (unknown)

Submitted by: admin

Language: English

Is draft: No

Current page: webform_submission_import

Webform: Vendor Performance Evaluation

Locked: Yes

Agency Military Affairs Dept

Contractor Sain Group, LLC

SWIFT Contract Number 200933

Project Name Installation Energy and Water Plan (IEWP) for Minn

Project Number (if applicable) 21145

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Project Name: Installation Energy and Water Plan (IEWP) for Minnesota Department of Military Affairs (DMA) Facilities at Camp Ripley Training Center (CRTC), Little Falls, MN and Various National Guard Locations throughout Minnesota (Project No. 21145)

Purpose: Professional Architect-Engineering services to support development of an Army Installation Energy and Water Plan (IEWP) for Camp Ripley, Little Falls, MN and various National Guard Armory locations throughout the state following all guidelines and requirements laid out by the Department of the Army Guidance for IEWPs

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 09/27/2021 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 09/30/2022 - 00:00

Actual end date Sat, 12/31/2022 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $347446.57

Amendments $40933.89

Contract total $388440.46

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Federal

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Lance Hauser

Evaluator Email Address lance.w.hauser.mil@army.mil

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Contractor staffing issues cause the need for an extension of the contract, resulting in higher order deadlines missed. Renegotiated deadlines were met.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Satisfactory

Evaluate the contractor's cost Satisfactory

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Delivered a good product.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): No

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied