Submission Number: 25257
Submission ID: 77396
Submission UUID: 7f9e5e97-eaed-4bca-b0bb-d67ddd52b8a3

Created: Wed, 05/31/2023 - 17:46
Completed: Wed, 05/31/2023 - 17:46
Changed: Thu, 06/01/2023 - 12:33

Remote IP address: (unknown)
Submitted by: mindy.hexum
Language: English

Is draft: No

Locked: Yes
Health Department
Shepherd Data Services
221316
Subpoena -- project management
{Empty}
Purpose of this work order contract was to provide document review services to assist MDH in responding to a subpoena for document production. Project involved document review (for responsiveness, privilege, and not public data) by multiple contracted attorneys, requiring project management services.
Contract was necessary for MDH to fufill legal obligations under subpoena. MDH resources for document review and management of document review project were insufficient to handle in-house, due to number of documents, complexity of the project, and other demands on staff time.
Project Duration
Fri, 11/18/2022 - 00:00
Sun, 04/30/2023 - 00:00
Sun, 04/30/2023 - 00:00
Yes
{Empty}
Contract Amounts
$56700
{Empty}
$56700
Yes
State funds
No
{Empty}
Mindy Hexum
mindy.hexum@state.mn.us
Contractor completed document review work within timeline required for MDH to comply with the subpoena.
The final product appears complete and accurate in terms of document coding and redaction. Achieving a quality final product required active involvement by and feedback from MDH staff regarding the consistency and accuracy of coding. The contractor's project manager was receptive to feedback and made changes based on that feedback early in the project and throughout the process.
The final cost came in under contractor's estimate for the document review services for this project. Based on the RFP process, contractor's rates are comparable with other vendors providing the same services.
We are satisfied with contractor's overall performance. The project manager and other staff we interacted with were professional and communicative. Completion of the project on time, within budget and to expected standards required active involvement and quality review by MDH staff throughout the process, but the Contractor's project manager was receptive to feedback and willing to make process and project staffing changes where needed.
Yes
{Empty}
4 - satisfied