Agency MNIT

Contractor Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC

SWIFT Contract Number 220937

Project Name Workers Compensation Modernization Program (Campus) System Audit

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: BerryDunn was contracted to complete a system audit on Campus. The purpose of an External System Audit is to identify, examine and evaluate barriers to Campus usage and adoption and increased efficiencies across the Workers Compensation Division and impacting the external stakeholder community. A Solution Technical Review component will validate the technical efficacy of the fully implemented solution in the production environment to identify opportunities, concerns, or risks.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 11/16/2022 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 06/30/2023 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 06/30/2023 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $252255

Amendments $0

Contract total $252255

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Michelle Doheny

Evaluator Email Address michelle.doheny@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor provided all deliverables in a timely manner. The final deliverable was delayed slightly to account for discussion between DLI and the vendor, but it met all expected timelines.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor provided quality deliverables and communication throughout the engagement. The contractor met expectations and was open to working with DLI to ensure the quality met our expectations.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor provided the services needed for a reasonable cost.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor was committed to providing the expected deliverables to DLI. We worked through some concerns with the final deliverable and the contractor was professional and timely in responding to our concerns. The contractor worked well with a large group of stakeholders and provided detailed communication throughout the process.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied