Agency Agriculture Dept

Contractor Terracon Consultants, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 228053

Project Name Additional Plant Site Soil Assessment Work Plan #2 - State Fiscal Year 2023

Project Number (if applicable) RWA253112

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The purpose of this contract was to coordinate and conduct additional soil assessment activities at the former Kettle River Company - Creosote Plant Site in Sandstone, Minnesota. Data entry and reporting using the laboratory analytical data and GIS technology associated with the sampling was also completed. Preparation of a data package for solicitation of a State Contract hazardous waste disposal contractor and providing oversight the hazardous waste disposal contractor during purge water pickup was also completed. The assessment of contaminated soil will allow for future remedial excavation phases to protect human health and the environment from the impacts of agricultural chemicals (creosote).

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 05/02/2023 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 06/30/2023 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 06/30/2023 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $29577.83

Amendments $0

Contract total $29577.83

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? {Empty}

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) FY23 2801 B04311S7 B041E02 (State MERLA)

Evaluator Name Lee Zettler

Evaluator Email Address Lee.Zettler@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor completed services in a timely manner.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor provided excellent quality on the project.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor's costs were reasonable and fair. The contractor did a good job coordinating and consolidating tasks during mobilizations to the site. The contractor did a good job using appropriate level personnel to conduct site tasks.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor's overall performance on the project was excellent.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied