Agency Pollution Control Agency

Contractor Wabasha Soil and Water Conservation District

SWIFT Contract Number 205999

Project Name WinLaC Prioritization & Outreach Project

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: The WinLaC Prioritization and Public Participation Project identified priority water quality issues and concerns for the second cycle of the watershed approach. Issues and concerns were identified through chloride monitoring and waterside chat meetings with watershed residents. Information obtained from this project will help develop the second cycle Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Update report as well the WinLaC Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan.

Project Duration

Start Date Wed, 01/19/2022 - 00:00

Original end date Fri, 06/30/2023 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 06/30/2023 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $26000

Amendments $1000

Contract total $27000

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) N/A

Evaluator Name Emily Zanon

Evaluator Email Address Emily.Zanon@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Very satisfied - Contractor performed tasks according to contract terms. Sub-contractors utilized to perform specific tasks and were also very efficient and timely. Invoices were provided in a timely manner and contractor communicated regularly with MPCA on status of project tasks and any additional needs.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Very satisfied - Contractor was very engaged throughout the contract and appropriately managed tasks.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Satisfied - Services rendered under the contract were appropriate in cost. Administrative costs were under-estimated at the time of contract signing and amendments to the contract were approved to provide additional funding.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Very satisfied - Wabasha SWCD is an effective contractor with good communication and effective engagement.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): N/A

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied