Vendor Performance Evaluation: Submission #26427

Submission information

Submission Number: 26427

Submission ID: 94771

Submission UUID: 7c35f918-c629-41da-b141-f0a6cd104566

Submission URI: /form/vendor-performance-evaluation

Created: Thu, 04/11/2024 - 20:56

Completed: Thu, 04/11/2024 - 20:56

Changed: Fri, 04/12/2024 - 12:52

Remote IP address: (unknown)

Submitted by: teresa.ambroz

Language: English

Is draft: No

Webform: Vendor Performance Evaluation

Locked: Yes

Agency Health Department

Contractor SGH Communications

SWIFT Contract Number 156411

Project Name Diabetes Prevention Program

Project Number (if applicable) {Empty}

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Provide technical assistance and strategic direction for the CDC federal grant 1815 and 1817, which is focused on reaching
employers and supporting offering their employees enrollment into a CDC-recognized DPP program. Three different groups
are targeted to create a strategy to reach employers and increase enrollment including health insurers; influencers and employers.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 04/22/2019 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 03/31/2021 - 00:00

Actual end date Fri, 09/29/2023 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) 952

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $25000

Amendments $91200

Contract total $116200

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? CDC 1815 and 1817 Grants

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) CDC Approved Vendor via Cooperative Agreement/grant

Evaluator Name Teresa Rondeau-Ambroz

Evaluator Email Address teresa.ambroz@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor provided timely service.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor's work was consistently of high quality. This contractor had substantial expertise and provided valuable strategic direction to support successful engagement of self-insured employer groups and other key stakeholders.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Reasonable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Overall, we were very satisfied with the quality of the work provided.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): None.

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied