Agency Transportation Department

Contractor Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 226942

Project Name District TAMS Update

Project Number (if applicable) 1052905

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Having an accurate and complete database of hydraulic assets is in line with the agency's TAMP and will have many benefits to
managing the district's assets and planning its construction program. This project was intended to query historic records and
enter or update our database accordingly. There was not enough district staff to complete the work so we elected to contract
the work out.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 03/31/2023 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 10/01/2023 - 00:00

Actual end date Mon, 07/31/2023 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $139296.37

Amendments $35641.11

Contract total $174937.48

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? state funds

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Miller,Rachel Marcella

Evaluator Email Address rachel.m.miller@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Consultant communicated in a timely manner. Work pace was slower than anticipated. Some of this was due this being a new
type of work, therefore a learning experience for both consultant and MnDOT. However, some of this was due to inexperienced
staff having a slower rate.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Overall the data entered into TAMS by the consultant is inconsistent enough that it is unreliable. MnDOT staff will be reviewing
each roadway section in detail and correcting before being able to use the data.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The amount of hours put into the contract for the work was an estimate on both the consultant and MnDOT's part as there has
not been similar contracts done to compare to. The work took much longer than anticipated, therefore much less of the district's area was completed.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance good

Would you engage the contractor's services again? No

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 2 - dissatisfied