Agency Pollution Control Agency

Contractor AECOM

SWIFT Contract Number 233612

Project Name Former CS Service/LS0009293

Project Number (if applicable) Agency Interest ID number: 140146 Activity ID number: PRO20230003

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: AECOM will conduct a vapor investigation of the Harbor Inn, including sub-slab sampling, crawlspace and paired outdoor air sampling. AECOM will also conduct SVE system operation and maintenance activities, and collect pressure and PID readings. All services and/or construction activities will be subcontracted as per the purchasing manual. AECOM will summarize results in the appropriate reports.

Project Duration

Start Date Tue, 08/08/2023 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 06/30/2024 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 06/30/2024 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $53140.35

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $53140.35

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Kate Lewison

Evaluator Email Address Katherine.lewison@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Very satisfied AECOM kept me updated at all times on project status, and kept the site moving along. All submittals/reports were submitted in a timely manner and invoices were submitted on a regular basis.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Very satisfied All submittals/reports were detailed and comprehensive. All work was completed and the goals of the work order were accomplished.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Very satisfied Budget was well prepared and managed. Invoices were submitted on a regular basis.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Very satisfied AECOM has handled this difficult and complex project well, despite some unexpected circumstances at the site. AECOM’s PM kept the MPCA project team updated on a regular basis and met with staff to discuss next steps. This project required a great deal of communication with property owners, and AECOM handled this well and kept the project moving.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied